Find out how crypto perpetuals directly compare to futures across leverage, costs, and trading mechanics, plus which suits your strategy best in 2025 & beyond.
Key Takeaways:
Crypto traders often wonder whether perpetuals or futures offer the better balance between flexibility, cost, risk-to-reward potential, and control. This article is written for anyone looking to understand how these two derivative types differ in structure, risk, and practical use.
Our team has over seven years of direct experience trading leveraged crypto products across centralized and decentralized exchanges. We’ve analyzed market data, funding rate trends, fee models, and recent on-chain perp products to help you grasp how perpetuals and futures truly compare in 2025.
Keep reading to find out which derivative product fits you best. ⬇️
Crypto perpetual contracts are specialized derivatives that let traders gain long or short exposure to a cryptocurrency’s price without owning it directly. Unlike traditional futures, they have no expiration or settlement date, allowing positions to stay open indefinitely as long as margin requirements are met.
Each perpetual is collateralized, usually in stablecoins or crypto, and allows leveraged trading that amplifies both profits and losses with price movement. Prices stay close to the spot index through a funding rate mechanism, which adjusts periodically between longs and shorts to maintain alignment.
According to Coinerps data, the top 20 perpetual exchanges now process about $120-130 billion in daily trading volume, underscoring their global dominance. This sustained growth highlights perpetuals’ flexibility, deep liquidity, and constant availability, making them the most traded crypto derivatives.

Crypto futures are standardized derivative contracts that let traders agree on a fixed price to buy or sell cryptocurrency at a later date. Each futures contract carries a clearly defined expiration date, after which settlement occurs either in cash or by delivering the underlying asset.
Futures are offered in multiple timeframes, typically weekly, biweekly, monthly, and quarterly cycles, giving traders flexibility over exposure duration. Shorter-dated futures appeal to active traders seeking tactical opportunities, while longer-dated ones suit funds and institutions managing structured hedges.
They provide leverage and price predictability, helping traders speculate or protect portfolios against volatility without directly holding the crypto asset. As expiry approaches, the futures price converges toward the spot market, ensuring alignment between contract value and the asset’s real price.

Perpetuals and crypto futures are both leveraged derivatives but differ significantly in structure, fees, and trading behavior. Here are the main differences between the two contract types:
Fees in futures and perpetual crypto trading are the various charges traders pay to open, hold, or close derivative positions across exchanges. They directly affect profit margins, especially for traders using leverage or placing frequent orders in volatile markets.
Most exchanges charge small percentage-based trading fees on every order, called maker-taker fees, which vary by execution type and volume. Market orders (takers) usually cost more because they fill instantly, while limit orders (makers) charge less for adding liquidity to the book.
Perpetual contracts also include funding payments that occur several times daily to align contract prices with the spot market. Futures, in contrast, apply only fixed trading and settlement fees at entry and expiry, making their overall cost easier to estimate.

Perpetual trading fees consist of maker-taker commissions and recurring funding payments that keep contract prices aligned with the underlying spot market.
Here are the main components of perpetual fee structures:
Futures trading fees include only maker-taker execution costs and potential rollover expenses that occur when contracts reach expiration or are renewed.
Here are the key components of futures fee structures:
Crypto perpetual contracts typically offer far higher leverage limits, allowing traders to amplify exposure with minimal collateral. Major exchanges like Binance and Bybit permit up to 125x leverage, while MEXC offers 500x and Aster pushes the extreme with 1001x on select markets.
In contrast, crypto futures products usually maintain lower leverage caps, commonly ranging from 10x to 20x, occasionally reaching 50x on less regulated venues. This reduced leverage helps manage liquidation risk and aligns with stricter margin requirements often enforced on regulated or institutional platforms.
In decentralized finance, perpetual contracts dominate derivative trading because they can operate continuously without expiries or centralized clearing. True dated futures are rare in DeFi, as managing multiple expirations on-chain would fragment liquidity and complicate settlement.
According to The Block’s DEX to CEX Futures Trade Volume data, decentralized perps reached an all-time high of 14.06%, marking record on-chain market share. This growth was driven primarily by the trading meta created by Hyperliquid and later expanded through DEXs like ApeX, Aster, Lighter, and EdgeX.
These protocols introduced near-centralized exchange performance, deep liquidity, and high leverage options, closing the gap between on-chain and centralized trading. As a result, decentralized perpetuals now represent a meaningful share of global derivatives volume.

Both perpetuals and crypto futures expose traders to amplified risks due to leverage, volatility, and market structure. Understanding how each product handles liquidation, funding, and expiry helps manage exposure and avoid unexpected losses.
Perpetuals carry continuous exposure and high leverage, making them especially vulnerable to sudden price movements in 24-hour markets. Main risk factors include:
Perpetual traders must actively monitor funding rates, margin health, and market volatility to control risk and prevent full liquidation.

Crypto futures have fixed expirations, meaning traders face risks from settlement mechanics, rollover requirements, and shifting market expectations. Primary risks to consider include:
Futures traders should manage expiries carefully, avoid thinly traded contracts, and maintain adequate margin buffers to mitigate forced settlements.

Tax treatment for crypto derivatives depends on product type, holding period, and jurisdiction, influencing how profits and losses are ultimately reported.
In most major jurisdictions, futures contracts listed on regulated venues like CME receive more favorable classification and clearer reporting requirements. In the United States, they often qualify as Section 1256 contracts, meaning 60% of gains are taxed as long-term and 40% as short-term, even if held briefly.
By contrast, perpetual contracts traded on offshore or decentralized exchanges are usually taxed as regular crypto property disposals rather than formal derivatives. Each closed trade and funding payment is recognized as a taxable event, often at standard income or short-term capital gains rates.
Perpetual swaps dominate crypto because they have no expiry, centralized liquidity, and allow long or short exposure with adjustable leverage. Dated futures matter because they match defined timelines, avoid recurring funding fees, and provide clearer regulatory standing and taxation advantages.
Select the instrument based on timeline, funding versus rollover costs, and regulatory comfort, because each structure serves a strategic purpose. Perpetuals benefit traders managing funding and liquidation constantly, whereas dated futures benefit planners seeking known maturities and quarter-end reporting.
Yes, many major exchanges like Binance, OKX, and Bitget offer both products, allowing traders to switch between perpetuals for flexible exposure and futures for time-defined hedges within a single account.
Collateral varies by platform: centralized exchanges often use USDT, USDC, or BTC as margin, while DeFi platforms like Hyperliquid and Aster allow multi-asset collateral, including ETH, stablecoins, or LP tokens.
Not always. Funding can sometimes favor shorts, meaning traders receive payments instead of paying them. However, during strong trends, funding usually turns costly for the dominant side, increasing long-term holding expenses.
Centralized exchanges rely on internal risk systems and insurance funds to handle liquidations, while DeFi platforms execute transparent smart-contract liquidations that automatically distribute losses and maintain collateral solvency on-chain.